THE DETAILS: Many supporters of Moon photo fakery theories have remarked that in some pictures the astronauts have the sun behind them and are therefore brightly backlit, yet they don’t show up as dark silhouettes as normally happens in backlit situations. On the contrary, their shadow side is perfectly visible.
An example of this phenomenon is Apollo 15 photograph AS15-85-11514 (shown below): the direction of astronaut David Scott’s shadow indicates that the photographer (James Irwin) is facing the sun and therefore Scott’s side facing the camera is in shadow, yet we can see it clearly. It is claimed that this is impossible in the vacuum of the Moon, because there’s no atmosphere to diffuse the sunlight and therefore the shadow side of an astronaut should be pitch black. The same claim is applied to Aldrin’s “tourist photo”, AS11-40-5903.
Detail of photograph AS15-85-11514 (Apollo 15).
This argument is based on an incorrect premise. In actual fact, the laws of physics and optics don’t say that the shadow side of a backlit object is lit by diffusion, which is the scattering of light produced by the gas molecules, suspended dust and water droplets of an atmosphere. They say that shadow lighting is caused mainly by the reflection of light from nearby objects, which does not require an atmosphere. So reflection works fine in a near-vacuum such as the Moon.
Indeed, photographers use reflection (not diffusion) all the time to soften the shadows of a portrait by placing the subject close to a brightly lit wall or by using custom-built reflective panels, which are kept out of frame, as in the example below.
Reflection on a bright surface is often used to soften the shadows of a person standing against the sun. Credit: Lisa Attivissimo.
On the Moon, this reflection is provided by the ground, which is in full sunlight and is all around the astronauts, who are wearing a highly reflective white spacesuit.
The fact that an atmosphere is not needed to obtain a fill light in backlit pictures is demonstrated by Space Shuttle photographs, where the astronaut is in the vacuum of space but the light reflected by the surrounding surfaces and by the daylit Earth below is more than enough to soften the shadows. In the photobelow, for example, the only source of direct light is the sun, but the white surfaces of the Shuttle cargo bay reflect enough of this sunlight to lighten the shadows on astronaut Bruce McCandless.
Astronaut Bruce McCandless works in the vacuum of space outside the Shuttle (1984). Photo GPN-2000-001075.
In other words, the explanation of this alleged anomaly is the same one given for the objection that astronauts in shadow are strangely well-lit. In that case, the conspiracists argued that the counterintuitive lighting was evidence of studio spotlights, whereas here they claim that shadow softening is evidence of an atmosphere. In both instances their claims turn out to be factually incorrect.