THE DETAILS: Descriptions of the first Moon landing often mention dramatically that the automatic systems of the lunar module were taking astronauts Armstrong and Aldrin straight into a dangerous crater surrounded by large boulders, but Armstrong took manual control and flew on to find a clear landing spot. This took so much time that the Apollo 11 astronauts landed with less than a minute of fuel to spare. This episode is frequently used to point out the advantages of having a pilot on board to deal with the shortcomings of automatic systems and to stress how difficult and dangerous it was to land on the Moon.
However, the photographs taken by Aldrin and Armstrong show no trace of this alleged boulder field. As far as the eye can see, the landing site is flat and featureless. Perhaps, it is argued, this detail was added to embellish the story and make it more exciting.
That’s a doubt that we can dispel by looking at the data. Apollo 11’s landing path, or ground track, is published in the Apollo 11 Mission Report.
The ground track of Apollo 11 ends on the left. The large crater at the center is known as West Crater. Detail from the Apollo 11 Mission Report (1969).
Armstrong’s decision is transcribed in the 1969 Technical Debrief; the Apollo 11 Preliminary Science Report identifies the boulder-littered crater as West Crater. This crater is visible in the photograph shown above, but no boulders can be seen due to its low resolution.
Today, however, we have the high-resolution pictures of the Apollo 11 landing site acquired by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) probe since 2009. These images show the boulders quite clearly.
The Apollo 11 landing site as imaged by the LRO probe in 2009. West crater is at the top; the image is rotated 90° counterclockwise with respect to the previous one. The arrow indicates the descent stage of the lunar module.
In particular, image M109080308RE, taken by the LRO probe and shown partially above, captures West Crater in very fine detail (this image is rotated 90° counterclockwise with respect to the previous one). It shows that the crater is indeed surrounded by boulders, which stand out as white dots. Their size can be grasped by noting that the white dot indicated by the arrow above is the central part of Apollo 11’s descent stage, which is about four meters (13 feet) wide without the landing legs.
The boulders can’t be seen in the photographs taken by the Apollo 11 astronauts for two main reasons. The first one is that they were too far away: the scale the figures indicates that the center of West Crater was over 500 meters (1,600 feet) from the LM.
The second reason is that in order to take any pictures of West Crater, the astronauts would have had to point the camera towards the sun. This would have produced very poor, lens flare-filled photographs, so no photos were taken in that direction. In some pictures, West Crater is at the very edge of the frame and a few boulders can be glimpsed, but only in the high-resolution versions, as shown for example below.
Detail of photo AS11-40-5873 (Apollo 11), taken almost fully upsun. West Crater is on the horizon, to the left.
However, there’s another source of photographic coverage of the area supplied by the Apollo 11 astronauts: the 16 mm color film shot during descent and landing. Since the lunar module flew past West Crater as it descended to land, the boulder field should be quite visible in this film.
Indeed it is: here is a frame from that footage, taken from an altitude of about 120 meters (390 feet) with the camera looking down almost vertically. The boulders are large enough to be distinctly visible from that height and cast conspicuous shadows.
Boulders near the landing site, seen from approximately 120 meters (390 feet), in a frame of the 16 mm film of the landing.
As a further cross-check, researchers Rene and Jonathan Cantin produced and published a video that matches the Apollo 11 landing film against a photograph of the same area taken in 1967 by an uncrewed Lunar Orbiter probe; the same footage has also been compared by another researcher, GoneToPlaid, with more recent Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter images of the landing site, included in Google Moon. In both instances, the positions of the craters line up correctly.
In other words, instead of being evidence of conspiracy, the issue of the apparently missing boulders is a great opportunity to perform cross-checks on the available documents and verify that they are mutually consistent.